News - All Departments and Unions

This is the news page for all IWW Departments and Unions. This page displays *all* news items from every Department and Union. To see news only from a particular Department, click on the Department title below.

For an overview of the IWW's Union structure, please visit the Unions homepage.

For branch, campaign, or general labor news, click on the appropriate sub-menu bars at the left under the main "news" bar.

世界工業勞工(IWW) -- 革命工聯初步

自從1970年,全世界有個大改變。 前所未知的"財富"轉移,導致無數人貧窮,而少數幾個富到以往所無法夢想。我們可以看到:

今天,世界的340位億萬富翁控制的財富,超過20億最窮的人的總所有。每天我們看到飢餓,環境惡化和人類文明的毀壞,為了什麼呢?讓區區一、二千人暴富和掌權。

我們看到了所謂「共產主義」體制的崩解,還有一個差不了多少的自由市場體系的開始。

我們看到工業主義移到前社會主義國家和"開發中"國家和連帶的狂買情況和資源整批竊盜的興起。

世界工業勞工(IWW或Wobblies)是從1905年開始就存在的革命工聯。IWW是由北美洲要求一個真正激進,民主工會的一般勞工所建立。

在工會中,Wobblies是有名的,老闆們怕我們。透過我們民主的結構,彈性策略,團結和未來的願景,IWW的影響一直被全世界感受到。

而IWW在今天比以往更加重要。我們希望這份簡介,能鼓舞你加入我們,一起建造所有勞工的「單一大聯盟」,並一舉掃除剝削的資本主義和階級社會。

世界工業勞工(IWW) -- 革命工聯初步

自從1970年,全世界有個大改變。 前所未知的"財富"轉移,導致無數人貧窮,而少數幾個富到以往所無法夢想。我們可以看到:

今天,世界的340位億萬富翁控制的財富,超過20億最窮的人的總所有。每天我們看到飢餓,環境惡化和人類文明的毀壞,為了什麼呢?讓區區一、二千人暴富和掌權。

我們看到了所謂「共產主義」體制的崩解,還有一個差不了多少的自由市場體系的開始。

我們看到工業主義移到前社會主義國家和"開發中"國家和連帶的狂買情況和資源整批竊盜的興起。

世界工業勞工(IWW或Wobblies)是從1905年開始就存在的革命工聯。IWW是由北美洲要求一個真正激進,民主工會的一般勞工所建立。

在工會中,Wobblies是有名的,老闆們怕我們。透過我們民主的結構,彈性策略,團結和未來的願景,IWW的影響一直被全世界感受到。

而IWW在今天比以往更加重要。我們希望這份簡介,能鼓舞你加入我們,一起建造所有勞工的「單一大聯盟」,並一舉掃除剝削的資本主義和階級社會。

Workers at Kosher Food Producer Score Legal Victory for Equal Rights: Labor Board Prohibits Employers from Engaging in Discriminatory 'Fishing Expeditions'

Washington, DC- Immigrant workers organizing for justice at a Brooklyn-based producer and distributor of kosher food products have taken a big step forward in their campaign and achieved a legal victory for workers around the country. Using discriminatory allegations about workers' immigration status, Flaum Appetizing has been resisting compliance with a 2009 trial decision that found the company illegally fired employees who came together seeking dignified working conditions. The National Labor Relations Board holding precludes Flaum from continuing to raise baseless immigration status defenses against at least eleven of the workers, and potentially as many as fifteen. By prohibiting employers from engaging in discriminatory 'fishing expeditions' against immigrants or perceived immigrants, the Board clarified important procedural safeguards in cases governed by the landmark anti-immigrant Supreme Court case, Hoffman Plastic.

"Companies that discriminate and undermine labor rights drive down economic standards for every working person, native-born and immigrant alike," said Daniel Gross, the director of non-profit organization Brandworkers, which, along with the Industrial Workers of the World labor union is campaigning for justice at Flaum as part of the Focus on the Food Chain campaign. "Worker organizing helps create the type of quality jobs that support a dynamic economy and healthy communities. The Labor Board's decision is an important step toward ensuring that Flaum and companies like it will not escape accountability through unfounded and discriminatory inquiries into immigration status."

New York grocery stores and restaurants rely on an industrial corridor of food processing factories and distribution warehouses like Flaum that hold down wages and safety standards by exploiting recent immigrant workers. Wage theft, discrimination, and abuse is common in the sector and efforts for change are almost always met with determined and unlawful retaliation. Overcoming these challenges, the Flaum workers are waging a powerful campaign to bring the company into compliance with fundamental workplace protections. The workers have shared their story and persuaded over 120 of NYC's most prominent supermarket locations to discontinue selling Flaum products, including it's Sonny & Joe's hummus, until the company comports with the rule of law. The global kosher cheese giant Tnuva refused to renew its distribution contract with Flaum after spirited worker campaigning and support from Jewish organizations including Uri L'Tzedek, the Orthodox social  justice organization.

"We're glad Flaum didn't get away with avoiding its responsibilities under the law," said Maria Corona, one of the victorious workers and a Focus on the Food Chain member. "There's power in coming together with your co-workers and we are well on our way to winning the justice we have been seeking."

The NLRB's Office of the General Counsel is prosecuting the case against Flaum. The Flaum workers are represented by Eisner & Mirer, a New York labor & employment law firm.

Focus on the Food Chain promotes sustainable jobs and a thriving local food industry in the City of New York. Through organizing, grassroots advocacy, and legal action, the campaign challenges and overcomes unlawful conditions in food processing and distribution warehouses. The Focus campaign is a collaboration of non-profit organization Brandworkers and the NYC Industrial Workers of the World labor union.

Bread and Roses a Hundred Years On

By Andy Piascik

This story will appear in the March 2012 issue of the Industrial Worker.

One hundred years ago, in the dead of a Massachusetts winter, the great 1912 Lawrence Textile Strike—commonly referred to as the “Bread and Roses” strike—began. Accounts differ as to whether a woman striker actually held a sign that read “We Want Bread and We Want Roses, Too.” No matter. It’s a wonderful phrase, as appropriate for the Lawrence strikers as for any group at any time: the notion that, in addition to the necessities for survival, people should have “a sharing of life’s glories,” as James Oppenheim put it in his poem “Bread and Roses.”

Though 100 years have passed, the Lawrence strike resonates as one of the most important in the history of the United States. Like many labor conflicts of the 19th and early 20th centuries, the strike was marked by obscene disparities in wealth and power, open collusion between the state and business owners, large scale violence against unarmed strikers, and great ingenuity and solidarity on the part of workers. In important ways, though, the strike was also unique. It was the first large-scale industrial strike, the overwhelming majority of the strikers were immigrants, most were women and children, and the strike was guided in large part by the revolutionary strategy and vision of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW).

Beyond its historical significance, elements of this massive textile strike may be instructive to building a radical working class movement today. It is noteworthy that the Occupy movement shares many philosophical and strategic characteristics with the Lawrence strike—direct action, the prominent role of women, the centrality of class, participatory decision-making, egalitarianism, an authentic belief in the Wobbly principle that We Are All Leaders—to name just a few. During the two months of the strike, the best parts of the revolutionary movement the IWW aspired to build were expressed. The Occupy movement carries that tradition forward, and as the attempt at a general strike in Oakland and solidarity events such as in New York for striking Teamsters indicate, many in Occupy understand that the working class is uniquely positioned to challenge corporate power. While we deepen our understanding of what that means and work to make it happen, there is much of value we can learn from what happened in Lawrence a century ago.

London IWW Cleaners: Workplace Occupation Stoped by Police Threats

Cleaners at the Guildhall have been holding a sit in and stopping work since the 22nd of December because of mistreatment and intimidation. Early this morning [4th of January] management called the police, who came and intimidated and threatened the cleaners. The cleaners protested that they were holding a completely peaceful sit-in. They finally left due to police threats to drag them out physically.

The cleaners started organising in the summer, striking against unpaid wages. Since then they have been fighting for union recognition, better pay and an end to bad working conditions. After a new company, Sodexo, took over the cleaning contract, their union rep was suspended and they have been subject to all kinds of intimidation and abuse. The workers say there is one supervisor in particular who is abusive to them and there are currently various complaints by different cleaners against him, but Sodexho are refusing to do anything about his behaviour. Sodexho are trying to drive out the organised cleaners by continually changing their work areas, giving them the worst jobs, increasing their workload and, now, using intimidation and harassment.