Submitted by x345292 on Wed, 11/14/2007 - 4:42pm
Recyclers held a stop work rally to press contract demands on Thursday, November 8th, at recycling facilities in Berkeley. Thirty-five or so workers from two Berkeley recycling operations are in the midst of renegotiating contracts. At “curbside”, recycling trucks go out every week day morning to pick up residential recycling. Across the way at “the Buyback,” residential recycling from the trucks plus drop-off recycling is sorted by twenty workers. All workers are members of the IWW. Both union contracts expire on December 31st, 2007. During the rally workers from both shops stepped up and spoke about the need for unity, participation and solidarity in order to win their demands. Demands are not the same at both shops. However, workers at both shops are calling for a five dollar an hour wage increase across the board. This is a serious demand.
Submitted by x344543 on Sat, 09/15/2007 - 5:12am
By Fellow Worker Bruce Valde.
By now the story of what happened when truck drivers and loaders at Berkeley’s Ecology Center “curbside” recycling program refused to work until their demands were met is the stuff of legend.
This report adds more information concerning the IWW recycling sorters at a company in the same block who stopped worked and marched in solidarity to a meeting of the Curbside drivers and loaders in the midst of the work stoppage, which lasted from 6 am until 1 pm on Monday, September 10th.
Workers from Community Conservation Centers marched into the Ecology Center trailer in support of their co-unionists. The 25 workers at the Buyback are members of the IWW. When informed that trucks would not roll and that the drivers/loaders were holding a meeting, the workers at the Buyback stopped work and held a solidarity / safety meeting of their own.
Submitted by x344543 on Tue, 09/11/2007 - 2:09pm
By Mike H., Matt K., Steve O., and Bruce V.
The recycling collection workers at the Ecology Center's Curbside Recycling Program have long sparred with management over working conditions. The IWW has represented this shop since 1989. On Monday, September 10, 2007, the recyclers held a stop work meeting and refused to move their equipment until their demands were met.
The latest struggle occurred when the City of Berkeley added waste collection routes to their collection program. The City of Berkeley waste collection workers are employed directly by the city and represented by a SEIU 790, a "Change to Win" business union. The Ecology Center is operated as an independent non-profit which receives city money to help fund its recycling program.
Unlike many cities that outsource their municipal operations to private entities and non-profits (often to reduce operating costs and weaken labor union solidarity), the Berkeley Ecology Center has a unique relationship with the City of Berkeley. The Ecology Center created the city's curbside recycling program long before such programs were standard services.
Apparently, the contract with the city requires the Ecology Center to match their collection routes with the city's, even though the programs are mostly separate from each other. Prior to the city's change, the recyclers worked seven routes daily, three of which were duo-routes (having two workers per truck) and the remainder were solo.
Ecology Center management proposed adding an additional route, but making each of the eight routes solo routes. The Ecology Center recyclers have a route committee system, described in the union contract, though Management still has the official power to make the changes. While the union members on the route committee signed off on the changes, they were not aware of how the changes would affect the work once put into practice.
After the first week of the change, it was clear that the eight solo-route plan was universally unpopular among the union workers. The union recyclers met on Saturday, September 8, 2007, along with organizers from the Bay Area IWW branch and some rank & file workers from the city waste collection program. They agreed that they preferred to retain the duo routes.
On Monday, the crew refused to operate their trucks until Management agreed to restore the three duo routes. After it was clear that no trucks would move until the union's demands were addressed, Daniel Maher, the operations manager, agreed to consider alternatives to the new, eight-solo route plan. The union crew demanded three duo routes and five solo routes. Maher rejected this plan and asked the crew to "vote" on an alternative.
At first, Mr. Maher tried to single out shop steward, Mike Hudgins, and divide the crew, but this tactic didn't work. The crew was adamant about their demands and the strongest voices were those recyclers with the lowest seniority.
One hour later, the union crew revealed that their "vote" was to stand firm by their demands. Mr. Maher, having encouraged the crew to vote on an alternative decided that democracy was only acceptable if the outcome was acceptable to his interests and asked the crew to "vote" again! So the union crew repeated the process. One hour later, the results were still the same! It was obvious that the union wouldn't budge!
Submitted by x344543 on Wed, 08/08/2007 - 12:17pm
Disclaimer - the following editorial is not by a member of the IWW, nor do they necessarily agree with or endorse our organization. The editorial is posted here because it closely matches the perspective of many IWW members and the Preamble to the IWW Constitution. It also affects IWW members in Industrial Union 670 directly.
By Richard Mellor - AFSCME Local 444 Retired, Oakland CA, August 2, 2007.
San Leandro CA - After absorbing the severe financial stress of being locked out for a month, members of Teamsters Local 870 suffered further setbacks in the contract deal brought to them by Teamster officials. The employers, Waste Management Co, imported scabs from other parts of the U.S. during the lockout and brought in their other allies, a mediator and Oakland mayor, Ron Dellums. The liberal community and the heads of the labor movement in this area have revered Dellums, a former congressman and mentor of another popular liberal Democrat, Barbara Lee.
When asked by the press if the lockout “was a test of his leadership” Dellums replied, "I don't take it to have anything to do with me. It has to do with a company in a dispute with a labor union. It would be a gigantic mistake for me to personalize this. That's a journey I choose not to go on." (1)
With friends like these, it should come as no surprise that Waste Management got what they wanted. According to press reports, management got a five-year contract while workers got a 5% raise which with inflation will most likely be a wage reduction
Submitted by x344543 on Mon, 07/16/2007 - 4:49am
By Oscar the Grouch (with apologies to the Children's Television Workshop)
The following editorial is the opinion of the author, alone.
The lockout of Garbage Haulers in the East Bay is entering its third week. Waste Management is waging blatant class war on the garbage workers and working people of Alameda County in the east Bay Area.
The following article, featured in a recent issue of Socialist Worker makes it clear that Waste Management planned to bust the union from the get-go.
Worse still, the San Francisco Chronicle reports that Waste Management is ordering scab drivers to pick up trash in rich neighborhoods while ignoring the residents in poor and working class neighborhoods, subjecting the working class to disease and pestilence.
Share