San Francisco Bay Area GMB

This is the news page for our San Francisco Bay Area General Membership Branch. To get an overview about our contact info, news and events, please visit our home page.

Activists call for Muni fare strike, but even the most vocal opponents of the rate hike are reluctant to join the chorus

Disclaimer - The following article is reposted here because it is an issue with some relevance to the IWW.  The views of the author and the publisher do not necessarily agree with those of the IWW and vice versa.

By Matthew Hirsch - San Francisco Bay Guardian, August 24, 2005

Social change doesn't just happen of its own accord. It happens because of people like Jose Alfaro.

A lifelong San Franciscan who retired in 2000 from his job as a professional cook, Alfaro dedicates himself to making life easier for new immigrants to this city. He's a smooth, natural-born organizer, an affable man who can engage in two conversations at once while handing out flyers to the crowds passing by.

These days Alfaro is helping organize a fare strike to protest the increased cost of a Muni ride from $1.25 to $1.50, which will hurt low-wage workers and the elderly most, he says. (The senior fare increases only to 50¢, but Alfaro fears many still wind up paying more than they should.) He's part of a small, loose-knit group that's calling the strike, but without active support from labor and community organizations that previously opposed the Muni fare increase.

MUNI Social Strike: It's Coming!

An inevitable fare hike in the City’s public transportation system, San Francisco Municipal Railway (MUNI), is distressing the most vulnerable members of society: seniors, disabled, low-income residents and students. Bus fares will be going up from $1.25 to $1.50 this September. Along with higher fares, San Franciscans can expect service cuts to bus lines as well as a reduction in driver privileges and mass layoffs. The reason for these changes is to alleviate a $57 million deficit faced by MUNI. Several citizen groups opposing these measures are mobilizing to fight back. One such effort is a social strike planned to coincide with these fare hikes.

A very visible strike is set to take place just before bus fares shoot up in September. Protestors will be holding posters, handing out flyers and chanting to encourage riders to ignore fare hikes, and to drivers to allow non-paying riders to board busses and cable cars/street cars. The organizers of the strike, Social Strike.net, say that the issues are clear: this is the second fare hike in 3 years; service cuts include grossly slashing drivers’ pre and post operation breaks, which raises concerns about public safety and the betrayal of downtown businesses for not paying fees or higher taxes in subsidizing the transportation agency beleaguered with a deficit for several years in exchange for its bussing thousands of employees working at these downtown businesses.

MUNI To SF: Pay More, Wait Longer, Keep Quiet

Beyond Chron (reposted)Monday, Aug. 01, 2005 at 6:33 AM

Marc Norton 01.AUG.05 (The following opinion piece was submitted to the SF Examiner in response to an article on Muni. The Examiner did not print my piece. -MN)

The recent [July 25] Examiner article on Supervisor Tom Ammiano's proposed Muni charter amendment cries out for some historical background. Andrew Sullivan's claim that "Prop E is working" when Muni riders are facing yet another fare increase on September 1, along with fewer buses on nearly every line, is preposterous. It's time to fight back, not to accept the status quo.

The Prop E story actually begins in 1994, when a large and broad-based coalition, led by then-supervisor Sue Bierman, shook up the downtown kingpins by putting Prop O on the ballot. Prop O would have begun the process of setting up a downtown transit assessment district, and would have required downtown commercial property owners and landlords to pay for the huge subsidy they get from Muni delivering thousands of workers and shoppers to their doors every day of the week.

Try imagining what those downtown office buildings would be worth without Muni. The whole structure of downtown is based on Muni shoveling people through their doors. The 38-Geary alone is one of the largest transportation lines in the world. Take away Muni, and those skyscrapers are just big, empty monuments of concrete and glass.

NLRB Update: Nutraceutical / Fresh Organics dba The Real Food Co.

In late March & late April of this year, an NLRB Administrative Law Judge heard testimony on the Nutraceutical / Fresh Organics dba The Real Food Co. case. A decision on the various unfair labor practices charges filed against Nutraceutical prior and subsequent to the abrupt closure of Real Foods/24th St. is expected imminently. Here are some details on the case culled from the hearing transcript. (Although not identified in this trannscript, the IWW is the union discussed herein)

By rfworker@yahoo.com - Sunday, Jun. 26, 2005

A SUMMARY OF THE RECENT NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE LAW HEARING CONCERNING CHARGES OF UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES FILED AGAINST FRESH ORGANICS, INC. DBA THE REAL FOOD COMPANY, A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF NUTRACEUTICAL CORP.


The source for this summary was primarily the transcript from the NLRB hearing. In certain instances, hearing exhibits were also relied upon to provide details. Following the hearing, fifteen or more citizens who'd attended sessions of the hearing met to compare notes and discuss salient aspects of the testimony. This meeting was helpful in terms of later culling material from the hearing transcript, creating a hearing outline, and arranging the material thematically.

SF MUNI Operators Threaten Wildcat Strike

MUNI operators are threatening a wildcat strike on June 30th, claiming union leadership has not done enough to oppose layoffs and service cuts as its membership asked. Drivers have explained that this strike will also be in solidarity with riders who will be hurt by service cuts.

Muni drivers threaten walkout at month's end.

By Marisa Lagos
Staff Writer
SF Examiner
Published: Thursday, June 16, 2005 10:57 PM PDT


Some rank and file members of Muni's drivers union are threatening to walk off the job June 30, saying union leadership has not held strong opposing layoffs and service cuts as its membership asked.

Two drivers, Victor Grayson and Bari McGruder allege that Transport Worker's Union Local 250-A, which represents about 2,000 Muni drivers, did not notify the Muni management of a resolution the union passed at an April meeting. The resolution, which Grayson provided to The Examiner, stated that union members would refuse to sign up for any new schedules that reflect service cuts and demanded that the agency retain its existing schedule.

"With today's schedules, Muni can't lay off any drivers," the resolution read, in part.

The drivers who spoke to The Examiner said they have talked to hundreds of operators and estimated that up to 75 percent of the workforce would participate in a wildcat strike June 30, the same day BART's labor agreement with its unions also expires.

"Union leadership and Muni management have been in bed for years … it's time to put the cards on the table and say it's time to stop," Grayson said.

William Sisk, president of Local-250A, said he had not heard of the strike and that the drivers do not have the authority to call one. He called Grayson and McGruder a "small group of insurgents" and said they account for less than 1 percent of the union's members.

"If they do that, [Muni] can fire them," he said, adding that he will tell members not to participate. "The only thing we can fight schedules on is health and safety. We cannot fight a schedule just because we don't like it — management has a right to change the schedule."

McGruder said drivers have made sacrifices already in recent years, putting $1.5 million back into Muni's budget this year by giving up three days without pay. Both she and Grayson said they feared retribution for speaking publicly about the possible walkout.

To close its $44 million budget shortfall, Muni plans to raise cash fares by 25 cents, increase parking fees and fines and cut service on most lines. At least 150 layoff notices were sent out to drivers in anticipation of cuts this fall.

Since the budget was first proposed, transit advocates and the union vocally objected to the fare hikes and service cuts, arguing they will hurt The City's most vulnerable residents.

Grayson and McGruder contended that the strike was in solidarity with riders who will be hurt by the cuts.

"The wildcat action is not being done for selfish interests, it is in conjunction with workers and all working people who ride the buses," Grayson said.

But Richard Marquez, who has helped organize opposition to Muni's budget through the Coalition for Transit Justice, disputed that notion. He said a symbolic wildcat strike would not have significant weight.

When contacted by The Examiner, Muni spokeswoman Maggie Lynch said the agency had not heard of the possible walkout and referred questions back to union leadership.

A temporary walkout at Muni's cable car division in March over a driver's dismissal led to the transit operators who participated having to give back pay for the day.

---
(This part not in the Examiner)

To find out how you can support this action and also to organize with riders and drivers for a fare strike, calling for NO fare hike, NO service cuts, and NO layoffs visit http://www.socialstrike.org and come to our TOWN HALL MEETING- - Sunday, June 26th 7pm at CELLspace (2050 Bryant @18th)